Agencies not clear who opens
beaches on Long Beach Island
By DONNA WEAVER Staff Writer, (609) 978-2015
Published: Thursday, May 3, 2007
SURF CITY — There is some confusion as to which agency is taking the
lead on reopening beaches on Long Beach Island.
With less than one month until the Memorial Day holiday weekend, a
spokesman for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers said the state Department
of Environmental Protection, or DEP, is taking the lead on reopening beaches
in Ship Bottom and Surf City.
“I think it's premature for the corps to say that we are taking the
regulatory lead on this,” said Elaine Makatura, director of the DEP press
office. “I would say this is a collaborative effort. There are still a
lot of discussions and planning still going on.”
The discovery of military munitions on the beaches in March contributed
to the delay of the beach-replenishment project's completion in Surf City.
Also, beaches in Ship Bottom, which were part of the area where the project
tapered off, were closed earlier last month.
In a status report dated April 20 and posted on its Web site, the DEP
stated that the corps would be ready to open two taper areas from a technical
standpoint by April 27. Those areas include South Seventh to South Third
streets in Ship Bottom, and North 25th to North 21st streets in Surf City.
But no portions of the beaches were opened last week. Khaalid Walls,
a corps spokesman, said that from a technical standpoint there are portions
of the beaches in Surf City and Ship Bottom that are clear. However, the
beaches cannot actually reopen without regulatory concurrence, an agreement
on land use controls and the consensus of all stakeholders, according to
Walls.
The stakeholders that need to be accommodated include the corps; the
DEP; the federal Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA; Surf City; and
Ship Bottom, Walls said.
“So far we haven't been able to accommodate everyone and have the meeting
in order to reopen the beaches,” Wall said. “This is not really a setback;
we're just in the process of coordinating those meetings.”
The confusion in leadership comes just one day after the corps reported
more than 900 munitions had been found on the beaches since March.
“The bulk of the munitions that have been recently discovered are small
four inch boosters and some with three-inch projectiles. These munitions
have been found in multiple caches,” Walls said. “The munitions are World
War I era, most likely disposed of prior to World War II. It's looking
like these munitions were dumped in mass quantities.”
On Wednesday, Walls said he was told by his superiors that the DEP was
taking the regulatory lead on reopening the beaches.
“We're going to submit our recommendations to the DEP for the reopening
of the beaches, but it is my understanding they are taking the lead,” Walls
said.
Ed Voigt, a spokesman for the corps, said overall the project belongs
to the corps, but from a regulatory standpoint, for the beaches to be reopened,
both the DEP and the EPA essentially need to sign off on the decision.
“We cannot declare unilaterally that the beaches will be reopened. We
would have to check with these agencies before opening the beaches so they
would have the lead in that respect,” Voigt said Wednesday evening.
Makatura said that DEP Commissioner Lisa Jackson does not want the corps
to walk away from its responsibility to the project.
Walls said the corps plans to stay with the project “for the long haul.”
To e-mail Donna Weaver at The
Press:
DWeaver@pressofac.com
|